A recent Reuters Health reports states that
“treating the edges of a surgical wound with a fractional carbon laser
immediately before closing the wound — rather than the more traditional method
of waiting months to resurface surgical scars — will minimize scarring later.”
People
need to be wary of studies quoted to support absolute statements. There are few
real absolutes in science and far more in advertising. The study quoted reflects the interpretation of ten patient
photographs after skin procedures performed by dermatologists in which half a
wound was treated with laser.
The
conclusion that immediate fractional carbon laser treatment will make scars
less appreciable later is premature, to say the least. The second supposition, that using a laser months after an operation
for scar treatment is standard, is
spurious as well.
What
does the study prove?
Further
study is indicated to determine whether or not patients who have procedures by
dermatologists might benefit by laser treatment. With a small sampling of just
ten patients, no other conclusions are reasonable. Making a broad-based absolute
conclusion based on this very small study is not good science.
Problems?
(1) Scar
formation varies greatly, depending on the area of the body, type of skin, age
of the patient, and surgery performed.
(2) As
a general rule, health insurance companies will not pay for laser procedures to
treat scarring, and costs vary, greatly depending on the type of laser used
and the size of the area to be lasered.
No comments:
Post a Comment